top of page

Going FAR in Government Procurement: The Difference Between Sealed Bidding and Negotiated Procurement

Breaking Down FAR Part 14 (Sealed Bidding) vs. FAR Part 15 (Contracting by Negotiation)


When the federal government procures goods and services, it follows two main methods: sealed bidding and contracting by negotiation. These procurement methods are governed by different parts of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), specifically FAR Part 14 for sealed bidding and FAR Part 15 for negotiated procurement. Each method has its own set of rules, procedures, and conditions that make it suitable for different types of procurements. Understanding the distinctions between these two procurement processes is crucial for contractors seeking to participate in federal contracting opportunities. This article explores the key differences between sealed bidding and negotiated procurement, providing insights into their applications, advantages, and the processes involved.


ree

Sealed Bidding (FAR Part 14)


Sealed bidding is a procurement method used when the government can define the requirements of a contract with a high level of certainty, and when price is the primary factor in selecting the winning bid. FAR Part 14 outlines the procedures for sealed bidding, which is characterized by a highly structured, formalized process designed to ensure fairness, transparency, and competition.


In sealed bidding, the process is designed to identify the lowest-priced, responsive, and responsible bidder. The key steps involved in sealed bidding are as follows:

  1. Invitation for Bids (IFB): The contracting agency issues an IFB, which includes detailed specifications and requirements for the project. Contractors submit their bids based on the terms outlined in the IFB, and all bids are submitted in sealed envelopes, ensuring that no bidder has access to the information of other competitors until the official opening.

  2. Bid Opening: Once the deadline for bid submission has passed, the bids are opened publicly. The contracting officer reviews the bids to ensure compliance with the solicitation requirements. The primary evaluation criterion is price, although non-price factors may be considered to assess responsiveness.

  3. Awarding the Contract: The contract is typically awarded to the lowest-priced, responsive bidder who meets all the requirements specified in the IFB. Bidders must meet the technical specifications, delivery schedules, and other terms outlined in the solicitation.


Sealed bidding is appropriate for procurements where the requirements are clear, and the government can compare bids solely on price. It is a streamlined process that ensures a fair and open competition, but it can be limiting when flexibility is needed, especially in situations where the government needs to negotiate terms with contractors.


Contracting by Negotiation (FAR Part 15)


FAR Part 15 governs negotiated procurement, which is used when sealed bidding is not appropriate—typically when the requirements are complex or when factors beyond price are critical in determining the best value for the government. Unlike sealed bidding, negotiated procurement allows for discussions and adjustments with contractors to arrive at mutually acceptable terms and conditions.


Negotiated procurement is often used for more complex contracts that require flexibility, such as research and development, consulting services, or contracts with technical specifications that are subject to change during performance. The process for negotiated procurement includes the following key steps:

  1. Request for Proposals (RFP): In negotiated procurement, the government issues an RFP, which provides an outline of the contract’s scope of work, requirements, and evaluation criteria. Unlike the IFB in sealed bidding, an RFP may include both technical and price factors as part of the evaluation process.

  2. Proposal Submission: Contractors submit proposals in response to the RFP. These proposals include both technical and pricing components, and contractors are often asked to provide detailed information about how they will meet the government’s requirements. Unlike sealed bidding, proposals in a negotiated procurement can be evaluated based on factors such as technical merit, past performance, and the contractor’s approach to meeting the government’s needs.

  3. Negotiations: Once proposals are submitted, the government may enter into discussions or negotiations with the most competitive offerors. During these negotiations, the government may request clarifications, propose modifications to the contract terms, or ask for revised pricing. Contractors are given an opportunity to adjust their proposals in response to government feedback.

  4. Awarding the Contract: After the negotiation process is completed, the government awards the contract to the offeror that provides the best value, which may not necessarily be the lowest-priced proposal. The evaluation is based on the criteria outlined in the RFP, including technical factors, price, and past performance.


The negotiated procurement process provides the government with more flexibility in selecting contractors and allows for greater collaboration between the contracting agency and the offerors. It is particularly beneficial in situations where the specifications are complex or evolving, and where the government needs to work with the contractor to refine the scope of work.


Key Differences Between Sealed Bidding and Negotiated Procurement


  1. Procedure:

    • Sealed Bidding (FAR Part 14) is a more rigid process with a focus on price. The government issues an IFB, and contractors submit sealed bids. The contract is awarded based on the lowest bid that meets the required specifications.

    • Negotiated Procurement (FAR Part 15) is more flexible and involves a process of proposals and negotiations. The government issues an RFP, and contractors submit proposals that are evaluated based on multiple criteria, including price, technical approach, and past performance.


  2. Award Criteria:

    • Sealed Bidding is based primarily on price. The contract is awarded to the lowest-priced, responsive, and responsible bidder.

    • Negotiated Procurement considers both price and non-price factors. The government evaluates technical factors, performance capabilities, and cost, and then negotiates with contractors to achieve the best value for the taxpayer.


  3. Use Cases:

    • Sealed Bidding is appropriate for straightforward procurements where the government can clearly define the requirements, and price is the primary deciding factor.

    • Negotiated Procurement is better suited for complex procurements where technical expertise, flexibility, and detailed evaluation of contractor capabilities are important factors in the decision-making process.


  4. Flexibility:

    • Sealed Bidding is less flexible once bids are submitted, as there is minimal interaction between the government and contractors during the process. The focus is on ensuring the bids meet the requirements.

    • Negotiated Procurement allows for greater flexibility, as the government can negotiate terms with the contractors and make adjustments to the contract scope or pricing based on those discussions.


Conclusion


Sealed bidding and negotiated procurement are two distinct methods of government contracting, each suited to different types of contracts and procurement needs. Sealed bidding, governed by FAR Part 14, is a structured, competitive process focused on price, ideal for simpler contracts where the requirements are clear. On the other hand, FAR Part 15 provides a more flexible, negotiation-driven process for complex procurements where multiple factors, including technical capabilities and past performance, are crucial in selecting the best contractor. Contractors must understand the differences between these two procurement methods to effectively navigate federal contracting opportunities and align their proposals with the appropriate procurement process.

Thank you for reading!


Remember to like and share this article if you found it interesting or insightful. Also, feel free to check out some of my other posts by clicking the article button in the banner above.

Comments


bottom of page